HomeBrowseUpload
← Back to registry
// Skill profile

Grant Funding Scout

name: grant-funding-scout

by aipoch-ai · published 2026-04-01

数据处理API集成
Total installs
0
Stars
★ 0
Last updated
2026-04
// Install command
$ claw add gh:aipoch-ai/aipoch-ai-grant-funding-scout
View on GitHub
// Full documentation

---

name: grant-funding-scout

description: NIH funding trend analysis to identify high-priority research areas

version: 1.0.0

category: Research

tags: []

author: AIPOCH

license: MIT

status: Draft

risk_level: Medium

skill_type: Tool/Script

owner: AIPOCH

reviewer: ''

last_updated: '2026-02-06'

---

# Grant Funding Scout

**⚠️ Note: This is a demonstration/illustrative version using mock data for educational purposes. For production use, integration with real funding databases (NIH RePORTER, NSF Award Search, etc.) is required.**

Analyze funding patterns to guide research strategy.

Use Cases

  • Identifying "hot" research topics
  • Avoiding oversaturated areas
  • Strategic grant positioning
  • Parameters

    | Parameter | Type | Required | Default | Description |

    |-----------|------|----------|---------|-------------|

    | `--research-area` | str | Yes | - | Research field to analyze (e.g., "cancer immunotherapy") |

    | `--years` | int | No | 3 | Analysis time window in years |

    | `--output` | str | No | stdout | Output file path for results |

    | `--format` | str | No | json | Output format: json, csv, or text |

    | `--top-n` | int | No | 10 | Number of top results to display |

    Returns

  • Top-funded institutions and PIs
  • Emerging topic identification
  • Funding trend analysis
  • Example

    Input: "cancer immunotherapy", years=3

    Output: Funding increased 40% YoY; CAR-T and checkpoint inhibitors dominate

    Data Sources

    **Current Version:** Uses mock funding data for demonstration purposes.

    **For Production Use:**

  • NIH RePORTER API
  • NSF Award Search API
  • CORDIS (EU research)
  • Federal RePORTER
  • Private foundation databases
  • Risk Assessment

    | Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |

    |----------------|------------|-------|

    | Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium |

    | Network Access | No external API calls | Low |

    | File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium |

    | Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |

    | Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |

    Security Checklist

  • [ ] No hardcoded credentials or API keys
  • [ ] No unauthorized file system access (../)
  • [ ] Output does not expose sensitive information
  • [ ] Prompt injection protections in place
  • [ ] Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
  • [ ] Output directory restricted to workspace
  • [ ] Script execution in sandboxed environment
  • [ ] Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
  • [ ] Dependencies audited
  • Prerequisites

    No additional Python packages required.

    Evaluation Criteria

    Success Metrics

  • [ ] Successfully executes main functionality
  • [ ] Output meets quality standards
  • [ ] Handles edge cases gracefully
  • [ ] Performance is acceptable
  • Test Cases

    1. **Basic Functionality**: Standard input → Expected output

    2. **Edge Case**: Invalid input → Graceful error handling

    3. **Performance**: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

    Lifecycle Status

  • **Current Stage**: Draft
  • **Next Review Date**: 2026-03-06
  • **Known Issues**: None
  • **Planned Improvements**:
  • - Performance optimization

    - Additional feature support

    // Comments
    Sign in with GitHub to leave a comment.
    // Related skills

    More tools from the same signal band