HomeBrowseUpload
← Back to registry
// Skill profile

MBA Thesis Advisor Skill

name: mba-thesis-advisor

by chao1208 · published 2026-03-22

数据处理自动化任务加密货币
Total installs
0
Stars
★ 0
Last updated
2026-03
// Install command
$ claw add gh:chao1208/chao1208-mba-thesis-advisor
View on GitHub
// Full documentation

---

name: mba-thesis-advisor

description: >

MBA thesis advisor for improving academic papers to award-winning quality.

Use when a user wants to: (1) upgrade an MBA thesis to top-tier quality (e.g.,

Tsinghua excellent graduation thesis), (2) diagnose problems with an existing

thesis draft, (3) rewrite thesis sections with critical analysis ("writing style B"),

(4) build a strong theoretical framework, (5) identify and articulate the original

contribution (novelty) of a thesis, or (6) revise conclusions to be insightful and

non-trivial. Handles LaTeX-based theses (thuthesis template preferred) and Chinese

MBA thesis conventions. Trigger phrases: "帮我改论文", "MBA论文", "优秀毕业论文",

"thesis improvement", "论文诊断", "帮同学改论文".

---

# MBA Thesis Advisor Skill

This skill guides you through diagnosing, restructuring, and elevating an MBA thesis

from a passing draft to award-winning quality. It is based on proven techniques for

Tsinghua MBA theses but applies broadly to any Chinese or international MBA program.

---

Core Philosophy: Writing Style B (批判性写法)

Most MBA thesis drafts use **Writing Style A**: describe a company's problem →

apply standard frameworks (SWOT, PEST, Porter's Five Forces) → propose generic

recommendations. This produces forgettable, low-scoring work.

**Writing Style B** (critical-analytical) is what separates excellent theses:

  • Start with an **insider observation** that contradicts the conventional wisdom
  • Build a framework that **explains the mechanism**, not just describes the phenomenon
  • Produce **conclusions that are non-obvious**, falsifiable, and boundary-conditioned
  • The reader finishes thinking: *"I wouldn't have known this without this paper"*
  • **Three markers of Style B:**

    1. Counterintuitive finding backed by data

    2. Identified mechanism (not just correlation)

    3. Clear boundary conditions ("this holds when X, fails when Y")

    ---

    Phase 1: Diagnosis

    Step 1.1 — Read All Chapters

    Read every `.tex` file in the `mydata/` directory (or equivalent), including:

    `chap01.tex` through `chap05.tex`, `abstract.tex`

    For each chapter, assess:

  • What claim is being made?
  • What evidence supports it?
  • Is this original or could it appear in any industry report?
  • Step 1.2 — Score the Draft

    Rate the draft on five dimensions:

    | Dimension | Question | Red Flag |

    |-----------|----------|----------|

    | **Contribution** | What does this paper say that no one has said before? | "Any MBA textbook covers this" |

    | **Insider access** | Does the author leverage their unique position? | All evidence is publicly available |

    | **Theory fit** | Does the framework match the research question? | SWOT used as the primary lens |

    | **Data quality** | Are claims supported by specific numbers? | Qualitative description only |

    | **Conclusion rigor** | Are conclusions falsifiable and bounded? | "Company should improve X" |

    Step 1.3 — Identify the Insider Angle

    Ask the author five questions to unlock their insider perspective. See

    `references/diagnostic-questions.md` for the full question set.

    The answers to these questions are the **raw material** for the entire rewrite.

    Do not proceed to Phase 2 without them.

    ---

    Phase 2: Framework Upgrade

    Step 2.1 — Choose the Right Theoretical Backbone

    Replace or supplement generic MBA frameworks with higher-level academic theory:

    | Research Context | Recommended Framework |

    |-----------------|----------------------|

    | Organizational change / R&D management | Dynamic Capabilities (Teece 2007) |

    | Cross-cultural / institutional environment | Institutional Isomorphism (DiMaggio & Powell 1983) |

    | Strategy execution failure | Principal-Agent Theory + Path Dependency |

    | Technology adoption | Absorptive Capacity (Cohen & Levinthal 1990) |

    | Team / org design | Team Topologies + Conway's Law |

    | VUCA / uncertainty | VUCA framework + Scenario Planning |

    | Supply chain / platform | Resource-Based View (Barney 1991) |

    **Rule:** PEST and Porter's Five Forces are acceptable as *context-setting tools*

    in Chapter 2–3, but must NOT be the primary analytical lens in Chapter 4.

    Step 2.2 — Build the Analytical Framework Diagram

    Create a framework diagram (Figure in Chapter 2 or Chapter 1) that shows:

    1. External environment pressures → Company response mechanisms → Outcomes

    2. Where the theoretical lens applies

    3. The research question mapped onto the framework

    This diagram becomes the "backbone" referenced throughout the thesis.

    ---

    Phase 3: Excavate the Original Contribution

    Step 3.1 — Find the Mechanism

    From the insider angle (Phase 1, Step 1.3), identify a **mechanism**: a causal

    chain that explains WHY something happens, not just that it happens.

    Template:

    > "[Company/industry] faces [problem]. Conventional wisdom says [X]. But our

    > analysis shows the real mechanism is [Y]: when [condition], [cause] leads to

    > [effect] because [mechanism]. This matters because [implication]."

    Step 3.2 — Name the Contribution

    Give the original contribution a **memorable name or label**. Examples:

  • "运动式研发" (campaign-style R&D)
  • "本土化悖论" (localization paradox)
  • "监管驱动的战略漂移" (regulatory-driven strategic drift)
  • A named concept is citable, memorable, and signals academic seriousness.

    Step 3.3 — State the Contribution Explicitly

    In the thesis conclusion chapter, add a dedicated subsection:

    \subsection{理论贡献}
    本文的主要理论贡献包括:
    \begin{enumerate}
      \item \textbf{概念提出:}...(原创概念名称)...
      \item \textbf{机制识别:}...(因果机制)...
      \item \textbf{框架整合:}...(理论整合方式)...
    \end{enumerate}

    ---

    Phase 4: Rewrite Critical Sections

    Chapter 4 (Core Analysis) — Priority Rewrite

    This chapter must carry the weight of the thesis. Checklist:

  • [ ] Opens with the research question, not background narrative
  • [ ] Every section heading makes a **claim**, not a topic label
  • - Bad: "4.2 公司战略分析"

    - Good: "4.2 监管趋严下CT公司战略漂移的三重机制"

  • [ ] Each subsection: claim → evidence → mechanism → implication
  • [ ] At least one counterintuitive finding per major section
  • [ ] Quantitative evidence (even rough estimates with justification)
  • Chapter 5 (Conclusion) — Critical Rewrite

    Replace generic recommendations with:

    1. **Core finding statement** (1 paragraph): the single most important thing this paper shows

    2. **Theoretical contribution** (named concepts, mechanisms)

    3. **Managerial implications** (specific to THIS company, not any company)

    4. **Boundary conditions**: when do these findings NOT apply?

    5. **Limitations and future research**

    Avoid these phrases in conclusions:

  • "企业应加强…" (generic)
  • "建议公司提升…" (not actionable)
  • "未来可进一步研究…" (vague)
  • Chapter 2 (Literature Review) — Targeted Additions

    Add 3–5 foundational papers for the chosen theoretical framework (Step 2.1).

    Structure: existing theory → gap → how this paper fills the gap.

    ---

    Phase 5: Data and Evidence

    Step 5.1 — Identify Data Sources

    For Chinese internet/tech companies: annual reports (IR pages), WIND, Bloomberg

    For industrial/agriculture companies: CNKI industry reports, company IR pages,

    China customs data (海关总署), Ministry of Agriculture data

    Step 5.2 — Minimum Evidence Standards

    Each major claim in Chapter 4 needs at least ONE of:

  • A specific number with source citation
  • A named internal event/decision (anonymized if needed)
  • A direct quote from interview/survey (if primary research was conducted)
  • A comparison across time periods or competitors
  • Step 5.3 — Figures and Tables

    Minimum recommended figures for a strong thesis:

  • 1 framework diagram (Chapter 2)
  • 1–2 trend charts (Chapter 3: industry context)
  • 1–2 comparison tables (Chapter 4: company vs. peers)
  • 1 summary framework (Chapter 5: contribution visualization)
  • Use Python + matplotlib/seaborn for charts. Save as both PDF (for LaTeX) and PNG.

    ---

    Phase 6: Quality Check

    Before finalizing, verify:

    Academic Rigor Checklist

  • [ ] Every claim has a citation or data point
  • [ ] No paragraph is purely descriptive (each ends with "so what")
  • [ ] Theory names are correctly cited with original authors and year
  • [ ] Conclusion matches what was promised in the introduction
  • Style B Checklist

  • [ ] At least one finding that surprises the reader
  • [ ] Original concept or mechanism named and defined
  • [ ] "Theoretical contribution" section explicitly states novelty
  • [ ] Recommendations are specific to this company/case
  • LaTeX/Formatting Checklist (thuthesis)

  • [ ] All figures referenced with `\ref{}` and captioned
  • [ ] Tables have proper `\caption{}` and footnotes for data sources
  • [ ] Bibliography uses consistent citation style
  • [ ] Abstract clearly states research question, method, finding, contribution
  • ---

    LaTeX Workflow Notes

    **Thesis root file:** typically `my-thesis.tex`

    **Chapter files:** `mydata/chap01.tex` through `mydata/chap05.tex`

    **Figures:** place in `myfigure/` or `figures/`; reference with relative path

    **Build command:**

    cd <thesis-root>
    latexmk -xelatex my-thesis.tex

    **Git workflow:** commit only source files; ignore build artifacts.

    Standard `.gitignore` entries: `*.pdf`, `*.log`, `*.aux`, `*.synctex.gz`, `*.bbl`, `*.blg`

    Do NOT ignore: `myfigure/*.py`, `myfigure/*.png`, `mydata/*.tex`, `refs.bib`, `abstract.tex`

    ---

    References

    See `references/` directory for:

  • `diagnostic-questions.md` — Five questions to unlock the author's insider perspective
  • `framework-selection.md` — Guide to choosing the right theoretical framework
  • `style-b-examples.md` — Before/after examples of Style A → Style B rewrites
  • // Comments
    Sign in with GitHub to leave a comment.
    // Related skills

    More tools from the same signal band