AI C-Suite Multi-Agent Framework
name: ai-csuite
by clarezoe · published 2026-03-22
$ claw add gh:clarezoe/clarezoe-ai-csuite---
name: ai-csuite
description: >
Runs a script-backed AI C-Suite strategic debate for SaaS teams.
It builds a stage-aware executive roster, generates structured debate rounds,
synthesizes a Chief-of-Staff brief, and outputs a CEO decision with action items.
Includes security and output validation scripts designed for VirusTotal-safe distribution.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, Task
metadata:
version: 2.0.0
mode: prompt-plus-scripts
runtime: python3-stdlib
---
# AI C-Suite Multi-Agent Framework
Use this skill when the user needs a strategic decision on product, engineering, pricing,
go-to-market, hiring, operations, or competitive response.
The user's topic is: **$ARGUMENTS**
Runtime Contract
This skill is operational via local scripts in `scripts/`:
No hidden network execution, no obfuscation, and no credential reads are required.
Required Inputs
Load company context from:
If missing, ask the user for:
Stage Profiles
| Stage | Debate Agents | Rounds |
|---|---|---|
| solo | CEO, CTO, CPO, CFO, CoS | 2 |
| pre-seed | CEO, CTO, CPO, CoS, CV | 2 |
| seed | CEO, CTO, CPO, CMO, CRO, CoS, CV | 3 |
| series-a | CEO, CTO, CPO, CFO, CMO, CRO, COO, CSA, CISO, CoS, CV | 3 |
Data brief agents are always:
If `CV` or `CFO` are not in the debate roster for that stage, they still provide pre-round data.
Squads
| Squad | Members | Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy | CEO, CFO, COO, CoS | CFO |
| Product | CTO, CPO, CSA, CISO | CPO |
| Growth | CMO, CRO, CV | CRO |
Intra-squad challenges are direct. Cross-squad challenges are mediated by CoS.
Execution Steps
1. Security pre-check:
python3 scripts/security_scan.py .2. Build session packet:
python3 scripts/prepare_session.py --topic "$ARGUMENTS" --company-file config/company.yaml3. Run full debate:
python3 scripts/run_debate.py --topic "$ARGUMENTS" --company-file config/company.yaml --output logs/latest-decision.md4. Validate output integrity:
python3 scripts/validate_output.py --file logs/latest-decision.md5. Present result to user and ask:
Debate Protocol
Use this exact order:
1. Pre-round Data Brief (`CV` + `CFO`)
2. Round 1 independent positions (`3-5` sentences each)
3. Optional human checkpoint
4. Round 2 rebuttals and challenges (`3-5` sentences each)
5. Round 3 convergence (`2-3` sentences, only 3-round stages)
6. CoS synthesis to CEO Brief
7. CEO decision with action owners
Mandatory Output Shape
The final output must include:
Escalation Rules
Always enforce:
1. CISO legal/compliance risk must appear in CEO Brief
2. CFO runway risk under 6 months must include explicit severity
3. CV contradiction with consensus must be shown in brief
4. Deadlock after final round must show both sides
5. Radical position flips must be flagged
Quality Guardrails
1. Round 1 cannot be uniform agreement
2. No vague recommendations
3. Claims must tie to role or company context
4. CEO must state tradeoffs
5. CoS must probe for groupthink if consensus appears too early
VirusTotal Safety Profile
Distribution-safe expectations:
Compatibility
More tools from the same signal band
Order food/drinks (点餐) on an Android device paired as an OpenClaw node. Uses in-app menu and cart; add goods, view cart, submit order (demo, no real payment).
Sign plugins, rotate agent credentials without losing identity, and publicly attest to plugin behavior with verifiable claims and authenticated transfers.
The philosophical layer for AI agents. Maps behavior to Spinoza's 48 affects, calculates persistence scores, and generates geometric self-reports. Give your...